Those claims aren’t unfounded, considering the browser’s built on top of Google’s Chromium engine.įigure A Microsoft Edge is an alternative browser for the Mac that’s packed with many features. Microsoft’s replacement for the long popular (and infamous) Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, as shown in Figure A, is an alternative marketed as being fast and secure. Microsoft 365: A side-by-side analysis w/checklist (TechRepublic Premium) Often, however, users run into an issue in which a specific Web-based platform proves incompatible with Safari, or an alternate browser (often Google Chrome) may be recommended, instead. Mac users have many choices when it comes to a Web browser - Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Opera Norway’s Opera among them - but many professionals find it easiest just to use Safari, the browser included by default within macOS. But is Microsoft Edge worth the download? Erik Eckel explores just how well Microsoft Edge serves Mac users. Mac users have many choices when it comes to selecting a Web browser. The Apple M1's GPU prowess also has an inordinate impact on these test results, with Chrome both native and x86_64 translated on the M1 outrunning Chrome on the Ryzen U powered HP EliteBook.Running Microsoft Edge on a Mac: The pros and cons Safari enjoys an absolutely crushing advantage on this test, more than doubling even M1-native Chrome's performance. Chrome x86_64 under Rosetta2 takes a significant back seat to everything else here-though we want to again stress that it does not feel at all slow and would perform quite well compared to nearly any other system.įinally, MotionMark 1.1 measures complex graphic animation techniques in-browser and nothing else. This is the closest thing to a "traditional" outside-the-browser benchmark and is the most relevant for general Web applications of all kinds-particularly heavy office applications such as spreadsheets with tons of columns, rows, and formulae but also graphic editors with local rather than cloud processing. Jetstream2 is the broadest of the three benchmarks and includes workloads for data sorting, regular expression parsing, graphic ray tracing, and more. Speedometer shows a massive advantage for M1 silicon running natively, whether Safari or Chrome Chrome x86_64 run through Rosetta2 is inconsequentially slower than Chrome running on a brand-new HP EliteBook with Ryzen U CPU. This is probably the most relevant benchmark of the three for "regular webpage," if such a thing exists. The first benchmark in our gallery above, Speedometer, is the most prosaic-the only thing it does is populate lists of menu items, over and over, using a different Web-application framework each time. dmg is available today, and-as expected-it's significantly faster if you're doing something complicated enough in your browser to notice. That was and still is a true statement we find it difficult to believe anyone using the non-native binary for Chrome under an M1 machine would find it "slow." That said, Google's newer, ARM-native. Further Reading Hands-on with the Apple M1-a seriously fast x86 competitor In our earlier testing, we declared that the previous version of Google Chrome-which was available only as an x86_64 binary and needed to be run using Rosetta 2-was perfectly fine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |